On Gun Violence and the Orlando Shooting

It’s Thursday and I’m linking up with Amanda from Running with Spoons for Thinking Out Loud Thursday. And boy do I have some thoughts. This post has been rolling around in my brain for a while, so hear me out.

As the United States struggles to make sense of yet another mass shooting incident, we are rife with debates about gun violence and the second amendment once more. Each side is arguing their points, both vehemently and sometimes with little logic applied to their arguments. Those in support of the right to bear arms argue that enacting stricter laws on obtaining guns ‘won’t change anything because criminals will still get their guns illegally.’ What they fail to see is that changing the law and making it more difficult for people to obtain guns will drastically reduce the amount of shootings that occur in the US as well as save hundreds of lives. 

80% of guns used in mass shootings have been obtained legally. 

Let that sink in a moment. 80% of the guns that the perpetrators have bought in order to perpetuate mass murders have been bought through legal channels, according to this data accumulation. Which means that the murderer simply walked into a store that sells guns and purchased his weapon of choice. He then turned it on innocent citizens of our country. Whether that’s because they were angry with their jobs, coworkers, racist, sexist, xenophobic or in support of terrorist groups, they decided to kill people over it.

“But even if gun laws were enacted it wouldn’t stop people from obtaining weapons! Look at the war on drugs- drugs are illegal and people still get them!”

Yes, its true that people would still be able to obtain weapons from the black market if they wanted to. But it would be increasingly harder for criminals to obtain those weapons and less likely for them to be able to do so. Not only would they face stricter laws if they wanted to do so legally, but if they happened to try to buy illegally, they would have to first find someone who was selling the type of gun they wanted illegally. It would be a lot more difficult for them to get those weapons.


“But if people have guns they can stop the murderer from killing people!”

Evidence suggests that, while it’s good to think this could happen in theory, it simply isn’t true. Could someone stop a mass murderer if they used their own weapon? Sure. But the probability of them hitting the murderer on the first try and not adding to the confusion by firing their own weapon is slim to none. No mass shootings in the last 30 years have been stopped by an armed civilian. In the only mass shooting where an armed civilian attempted to use his own gun to stop the shooter (2011, Arizona assassination attempt of Congresswoman Gabby Giffords), he almost shot the wrong man and the actual shooter was brought down by an elderly man who tackled him and was not armed.

“Gun laws won’t decrease the murder rate…”

Actually, it will and it has been proven. In all the other countries that have stricter gun laws than we do. ‘Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the United States gun-related murder rate is 25 times higher.’ (According to a study published in the American Journal of Medicine). Furthermore from that study, ‘even though it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, the United States accounted for 82 percent of all gun deaths.’ That is a sickening statistic, to be quite honest.

Gun laws do work. On April 28, 1996, a gunman opened fire on tourists in Port Arthur, Tasmania. He killed 35 people and wounded 23 more, making it the worst mass murder in Australia’s history. In just 12 days, Australia’s government did something that in the last 30 years of mass murders in America we have failed to do; they announced a bi-partisan deal with state and local governments to enact gun control measures. They had a massive buyback of more than 600,000 semi-automatic shotguns and rifles. The new laws prohibited private sales, required that all weapons be individually registered to their owners, and required that gun buyers present a “genuine reason” for needing each weapon at the time of purchase. As the Washington Post pointed out, homicides by firearm dropped by 59% between 1995-2006. 

What I can’t understand is why people are so against implementing some form of gun control laws in the United States. I understand the desire to keep the firearms that those who argue against this law currently possess and I understand the desire to feel protected and safe- but can you really say you feel safe in this country today with all the gun violence that has been occurring in recent years? I don’t. Going to the movies, the mall, even a nightclub has become a potential scene of terror- places that used to be simply a fun night out. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t be allowed to own a handgun or a rifle. But I am saying that owning an assault rifle is beyond the scope of most civilians capabilities or needs. If you feel the need to walk around with an assault rifle, we have bigger problems than your rights to own a gun and defending the second amendment. We do not live in a country that is so violent that it is necessary for you to walk around with a gun designed to kill many people at one time. And, no, I’m not of the  mindset that “maybe one day we will need those rifles because the government is going to try to take over us and become a dictatorship.” Not unless you elect Trump for president, but my arguments against him are for another post.

We are talking about lives here. Human lives. This isn’t the time to argue about your own rights- not unless you want to sound like a selfish prick who doesn’t care about the hundreds of lives that have been lost to mass shootings in the last decade. The rights of humans to live full lives and not be shot in cold blood while going to the movies, the mall, school, even church for God’s sake- overshadow your personal right to own an assault rifle. As I said, I’m not asking you to give up your handguns. But I am asking you to sign this petition on banning assault rifles from the households of civilians. Please think about the lives you could potentially save. I implore you to see reason. Next time it could be your father, brother, sister, mother, friend who gets shot. Do you really want to risk that possibility?

Sign the petition: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/ban-assault-weapons-now-4?source=s.fb&r_by=15885511

more love less hate


Follow me on social media!
Follow by Email

8 thoughts on “On Gun Violence and the Orlando Shooting”

  1. I’ve seen a few memes recently that hit the nail on the head:
    1) The first is that mental issues + x = mass shooting, hate + x = mass shooting, and a few other examples, then it says, “solve for x.”
    2) The second is one of the founding fathers saying, well, gee, we were talking about hand loaded muskets, not assault rifles (with respect to the 2nd amendment).

    This whole situation is just sick and disgusting to me.

    1. Agree. That’s why I had to write about it and get my thoughts out. What I propose may not be perfect but I believe it’s a start and we have to do something. It’s just too much death to continue to sit back and be complacent.

  2. My main thought with all of the studies that show other countries gun violence compared to that of the US is this…have other factors been considered. Is there less poverty? Less unemployment? More care for mental health issues? Higher happiness overall? Are they as culturally diverse? Maybe these have all been considered & they have no impact. I just haven’t seen a study that acknowledged all of these factors & was able to conclude that they were not important.

    1. There very well may be other factors involved. When I was doing my research into these studies I couldn’t really find one that has answers to all those questions either. However- regardless of what the other countries statistics are- we do need stricter gun control measures. The amount of murders is getting ridiculous in this country.

  3. Thank you thank you thank you for mentioning that the “good guys with a gun will stop bad guys with a gun” argument is total bull. That’s probably the main one that pisses me off because it’s so ludicrous but so hard to rebut for some reason!

    You know I signed that petition. And you know my feelings on all this. <3
    Ali @ Hit the Ground Running recently posted…Summer PlansMy Profile

    1. I hate a lot of the arguments. They don’t make sense. Particularly that one and the “laws won’t change anything” argument. I don’t understand what people who argue against gun control want to happen. If they came up with a better viable suggestion I’d be willing to consider it but so far all they do is yap about how they are against it but don’t suggest anything alternative.

Comments are closed.